Adhering To Felix Baumgartner'' s free-fall from the side of area, a check out the physics of the rate of noise.

You are watching: How fast is the speed of sound in mph


This appears to be one of the most typical conversation concerning the current Red Bull Stratos Dive. Unless you have actually been living under a rock recently, you have actually most likely seen the amazing dive from 128,000 feet. Below is a wonderful recap video clip to obtain you inflated.

The main fastest totally free autumn rate was reported as 373 m/s. AH HA! That is simply hardly over the rate of noise at 340 m/s. My physics book states this is the rate of audio, so there. Well, not so quick. Audio is a rather complex point.

What Is an Acoustic wave?

Initially, allow me speak about simply appear in air. Naturally you can have acoustic waves undersea (hi submarines) and also via solids. Yet consider air. At one degree, air is comprised of an entire number of little bits. Oh sure, it is truly a lot more complex than simply little air bits. It is mainly nitrogen gas (N2) with some oxygen. However in this design of acoustic waves, it is great to think about them all as simply little bits.

What takes place if you take an entire number of these bits as well as press them all at the exact same time? Well, the pressed bits will certainly go a little means, however they will certainly hit various other air bits and also press them. Those bits will certainly ram even more and so forth and so forth. This is what we call a wave. The crucial point to recognize is that the air isn'& #x 27; t relocating extremely much, however the compression is relocating. Below is my effort at a representation revealing this.


One more wonderful instance of this is the wave in a football arena. Below is an instance in situation you have no concept what I am speaking about.


What walks around the arena? Individuals? No, they simply go up and also down. It is the disruption that relocates as the wave. The very same holds true for acoustic waves in air. OK, however that is simply a basic design of noise. Exactly how quick is the acoustic wave in air? Although 340 m/s (760 miles per hour) is an excellent very first response, it isn'& #x 27; t constantly real. Let'& #x 27; s recall a the wave of individuals in a football arena. What would certainly make this rate adjustment? 2 points might plainly make a distinction. Mean the arena wasn'& #x 27; t complete yet rather regarding every various other seat was inhabited. This can transform the rate of the acoustic wave. It isn'& #x 27; t rather clear if it would certainly make it much faster or slower, however I would certainly presume quicker because the individual would certainly be responding to the previous individual that was further away. An additional result might be from the performance degree of the group. If individuals weren'& #x 27; t paying much interest, it can trigger a much longer response time as well as therefore a reduced wave rate.

Really, currently I wonder. If arena wave rates are relatively consistent for various arenas and also groups, I question. My assumption is that they would certainly all have comparable rate worths. Possibly this will certainly be a future post.

OK, back to acoustic wave in air. What does this rate rely on? You can think a couple of points. Much like the football group wave, the thickness of fragments ought to matter. And also what concerning the stress airborne? That should matter as well, right? Remarkably (at the very least for me), a straightforward design for the rate of audio just differs with air temperature level. Why? Well, as you obtain greater in the elevation (as much as a factor), the temperature level lowers. The stress as well as the thickness of air additionally lower. The impacts as a result of stress and also thickness basically negate each various other. Like I claimed, this over streamlines the entire concern. If you are interested, the Wikipedia web page on the rate of noise has a great deal even more information.

Rate of Noise vs. Elevation

You can obtain a story of the rate of noise as a feature of elevation if you place this with each other. Oh sure, it will certainly transform with weather condition as well as things, however still you can obtain a rather standard design. Right here is a story of the rate of noise at various elevations over water level.


See more: Here'S How Can I Track Someone By Their Cell Phone Number For Free

Mixed-up degree, the worth is best around the 340 m/s mark. The rate will certainly drop down to about 200 m/s if you relocate up to 120,000 feet. Simply from this information, you can see that Felix Baumgartner did without a doubt drop faster than the rate of noise. Nevertheless, the inquiry doesn'& #x 27; t truly make good sense. Did he drop faster than the rate of noise mixed-up degree? Yes. Was he additionally going much faster than the rate of audio for the elevation he went to? Well, it makes sensible feeling that if the rate of audio is best mixed-up degree and also he went faster than the rate of audio he would certainly be going much faster than the citizens rate of noise.

Rate vs. the Neighborhood Rate of Noise

I put on'& #x 27; t recognize if "regional rate of noise" is a main term, however I like it. I am utilizing it to indicate the rate of noise at the existing elevation. Below is a story of the rate of Felix as he drops in addition to the story of the regional rate of audio at that exact same time.


You will certainly observe that from this mathematical computation, Felix was going quicker than the neighborhood rate of audio for regarding 45 secs. You must additionally discover that this estimation has his optimal rate a little over the reported worth of 373 m/s - ideally I can repair this later on when I contrast my version to the actual information - yet it'& #x 27; s not also away.

Mach Number

I presume I was appropriate (at the very least according to Wikipedia). It has the interpretation of Mach number as the proportion of the rate of a challenge the regional rate of audio. Right here is a story of the rate of Felix as a feature of elevation in regards to the Mach number (once more, this is based upon my not so ideal design).


From this, he had an optimal rate of Mach 1.7 rather than the reported Mach 1.24. Naturally this is extremely depending on the real rate of noise at that elevation. If the design is off a bit on the rate of Felix in addition to the rate of audio at that elevation (both making use of basic versions), that might discuss the inconsistency.

Regardless, there appears to be little uncertainty he went faster than the rate of noise. Nevertheless, he didn'& #x 27; t break the rate of light. What? Yes. Below is a display shot from MSNBC. I have difficulty thinking this is genuine, yet I couldn'& #x 27; t discover proof that it was phony. In situation you didn'& #x 27; t click the photo, it reveals Felix Baumgartner after he maintained his loss. The inscription reviews (as well as I youngster you not):